What Is The Average Annual Rainfall Of Egypt

contemporary Mughal-e-Azam and the "stories" special

Mughal-e-Azam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What a great movie! What a story! What a scene!

In comparison, the Bollywood today, with all its economic and technical, produces horrible film!

few days ago was broadcast on a satellite channel of Pakistan ....

Nothing strange about that? Yes, nothing strange. The Bollywood film also found a large following from our cousins \u200b\u200bin Pakistan.
But I feel I can do a reflection.

In their history the Pakistanis put everything that is functional to an alleged Muslim civilization of the subcontinent unrelated to the other "civilization" of the same territory. From the Indus civilization (the existence of a bulky presence Moenjo Daro and Harappa?) - Long before entering the stage of Islam (and Hinduism) - Tipu Sultan in (interesting characters whose lives are about to start a TV series dedicated to a satellite channel in India) across the Mughals. The "history of Pakistan is an artificial selection of facts, functional packaging of an equally artificial Pakistani identity, but you could say the same of similar attempts to build a historical exclusivity, carried out by the Hindu right in India. To unite these movements of thought and political action, Muslims and Hindus, is fundamentalism, which thrives on the fertile soil of ignorance of the masses from which bad teachers of each other's historical bias sow, reviving ancient wrongs and often unlikely that repair and predestined fate to which they march.

These artificial identity, today more than ever, are victims of their own contradictions. This is particularly evident in the case of Pakistan.

'It is a fundamental sociological law that what is considered to be true becomes true in its consequences' , writes historian Michelguglielmo Towers in his History of India, speaking of the ambiguous (and dangerous) " idea of \u200b\u200bPakistan "of Muhammed Ali Jinnah, the father of the" Land of the Pure. "

we succeed, sooner or later, to rectify the consequences of errors that we took for real?

Will we teach them to doubt, criticism and its tolerance?

Can we reconstruct a history that is not only of one or the others, but of humanity that we all toghether?

ps: on Radical Radio are a lot of audio work of Professor Towers.